Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology is a peer reviewed open access journal that focuses on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disorders in addition to related genetic, pathophysiological and epidemiological topics. Please see the Aims and Scope tab for further information.
This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Why publish in Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology?
- Listed in PubMed and freely available via PubMed Central
- Indexed in Web of Science Emerging Sources (ESCI), Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) and SCOPUS
- Rigorous peer review and prompt online publication
- Open access format, driving high visibility and global exposure
- Article metrics service to allow each author to monitor re-use of published articles
- Published by SAGE since 2016
Open access article processing charge (APC) information
The article processing charge (APC) for this journal is currently 2650 USD.
The article processing charge (APC) is payable when a manuscript is accepted after peer review, before it is published. The APC is subject to taxes where applicable. Please see further details here.
Submit your manuscript today at https://peerreview.sagepub.com/cic
Please see the Submission Guidelines tab for more information on how to submit your article to the journal.
Please direct any queries to Neisha.Jobanputra@sagepub.co.uk
Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology is an international, open access, peer-reviewed journal which considers manuscripts on the prevention, diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disorders, in addition to related genetic, pathophysiological and epidemiological topics.
The journal welcomes a wide range of article types, including original research, methodologies, case reports, reviews, perspectives, editorials and commentaries. Original research manuscripts may include in vitro studies as well as all phases of animal or human/clinical studies. All articles are listed on PubMed and are freely available via PubMed Central.
|Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia
|SAGE Publications Ltd, UK
|Hisashi Adachi PhD
|Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
|Michelle Bloom MD
|Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
|Arnon Blum PhD, MD
|Bar Ilan University, Galilee, Israel
|Lawrence Boxt MD
|Department of Radiology at Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA
|Francisco R Breijo-Marquez PhD, MD
|East Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
|Daniel Chikvashvili MD
|Nassau University Medical Center, East Meadow, NY, USA
|Leslie Cho PhD, MD, FACC
|Womens Cardiovascular Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
|Joaquin de Haro PhD, MD
|Hospital Universitario Getafe, Getafe, Madrid, Spain
|Makarand Deo PhD
|Norfolk State University, Norfolk, VA, USA
|DeLisa Fairweather PhD
|Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
|Dali Fan PhD
|University of California, Davis, CA, USA
|Peter Faries PhD, MD, FACS
|New York, NY, USA
|Michael L. Fitzgerald PhD
|Harvard Medical School Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
|Robert G Goldberg PhD
|University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
|Henry Greenberg PhD, MD
|St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital, New York, New York, USA
|Fumiyuki Hattori PhD
|Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
|Costin Nicolae Ionescu PhD, MD
|Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
|Nobukazu Ishizaka PhD
|Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
|Rita Jermyn MD
|Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, USA
|Hani Jneid PhD, MD, FACC, FAHA, FSCAI
|Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
|Daniel P. Judge PhD, MD
|Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
|Peter L. M. Kerkhof PhD
|Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
|Hani Kozman PhD
|State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
|Martin M. LeWinter PhD, MD
|University of Vermont, Vermont, USA
|John K. J. Li PhD
|The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
|Alessandro Lupi PhD
|Maggiore della Carita University Hospital, Novara, Italy
|Amgad N. Makaryus MD
|Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, NY, USA
|John M. Makaryus MD
|Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, NY, USA
|Allison McLarty MD
|Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
|Yukihiko Momiyama PhD
|NHO Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
|Monica Mukherjee MD
|Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
|Rod Passman PhD, MD, MSCE
|Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Illinois, USA
|Uptal D. Patel PhD, MD
|Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
|Carl J. Pepine PhD, MD
|Professor of Medicine, Chief Emeritus, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
|Arshed A. Quyyumi PhD, MD, FRCP
|Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
|Emi Saita PhD
|Ochanomizu University, Tokyo, Japan
|Gaetano Santulli PhD, MD
|Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA
|Rachad Shoucri PhD
|Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
|Manavjot Sidhu PhD, MD, MBBS
|University of Missouri, Columbia, USA
|Hal Skopicki MD, PhD
|Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
|Gerin Stevens MD, PhD, FACC
|Hofstra-Northwell School of Medicine, Hofstra University, Manhasset, NY, USA
|Anthony Szema BSE, MD, FCCP, FACAAI, FAAAAI, FACP
|Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
|Fijoy Vadakkumpadan PhD
|SAS Insitute, Inc, Baltimore, MD, USA
|Roman Zeltser MD
|Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, NY, USA
|Chunyu Zeng PhD, MD
|The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing City, China
Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology Manuscript Submission Guidelines
Table of Contents:
1. Open Access
2. Article processing charge (APC)
3. What do we publish?
3.1 Aims & scope
3.2 Article types
3.3 Writing your paper
4. Editorial policies
4.1 Peer review policy
4.5 Declaration of conflicting interests
4.6 Research ethics and patient consent
4.7 Clinical trials
4.8 Reporting guidelines
5. Publishing policies
5.1 Publication ethics
5.2 Contributor’s publishing agreement
6. Preparing your manuscript
6.1 Word processing formats
6.2 Artwork, figures and other graphics
6.3 Supplementary material
6.4 Reference style
6.5 English language editing services
7. Submitting your manuscript
7.1 How to submit your manuscript
7.2 Title, keywords and abstracts
7.3 Information required for completing your submission
8. On acceptance and publication
8.1 Sage Production
8.2 Online publication
8.3 Promoting your article
9. Further information
This Journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
This Journal recommends that authors follow the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals formulated by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
Please read the guidelines below then visit the journal’s submission site https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/cmic to upload your manuscript. Please note that manuscripts not conforming to these guidelines may be returned. Remember you can log in to the submission site at any time to check on the progress of your paper through the peer review process.
Only manuscripts of sufficient quality that meet the aims and scope of Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology will be reviewed.
As part of the submission process you will be required to warrant that you are submitting your original work, that you have the rights in the work, that you are submitting the work for first publication in the Journal and that it is not being considered for publication elsewhere and has not already been published elsewhere, and that you have obtained and can supply all necessary permissions for the reproduction of any copyright works not owned by you.
Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology may accept submissions of papers that have been posted on pre-print servers; please alert the Editorial Office when submitting (contact details are at the end of these guidelines) and include the DOI for the preprint in the designated field in the manuscript submission system. Authors should not post an updated version of their paper on the preprint server while it is being peer reviewed for possible publication in the journal. If the article is accepted for publication, the author may re-use their work according to the journal's author archiving policy.
If your paper is accepted, you must include a link on your preprint to the final version of your paper.
If you have any questions about publishing with Sage, please visit the Sage Journal Solutions Portal
Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal. Each article accepted by peer review is made freely available online immediately upon publication, is published under a Creative Commons license and will be hosted online in perpetuity. Publication costs of the journal are covered by the collection of article processing charges which are paid by the funder, institution or author of each manuscript upon acceptance. There is no charge for submitting a paper to the journal.
If, after peer review, your manuscript is accepted for publication, a one-time article processing charge (APC) is payable. This APC covers the cost of publication and ensures that your article will be freely available online in perpetuity under a Creative Commons license.
The article processing charge (APC) for this journal is 2650 USD.
Before submitting your manuscript to Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology, please ensure you have read the Aims & Scope.
1. Original Articles. The Editors will consider preclinical, interventional and observational studies with clearly stated aims, well-reported methodology (including main outcome measures) and results, and a discussion of the results in the context of the published literature).
2. Review Articles. The following types of high-quality review will be considered:
(a) General reviews that provide a synthesis of an area that fits within the aims and scope of the journal;
(b) Drug reviews – review articles focusing on the available evidence for the use of a particular drug or combination therapy.
3. Perspective Reviews. Review-style articles that address important new areas of general interest and afford the author the opportunity to present a forward-looking perspective on the topic and/or incorporate their own experience in the field;
4. Systematic Reviews. These should answer a specific research question and be reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. They should also include a PRISMA flow chart as a cited figure and a completed PRISMA checklist as a supplementary file (please see section 2.8).
5. Meta-analyses. These should answer a specific research question and be reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. They should also include a PRISMA flow chart as a cited figure and a completed PRISMA checklist as a supplementary file (please see section 2.8).
6. Case Reports. These structured reports should describe an unusual case and include a full review of the pertinent literature and a section on implications for clinical care.
7. Study Protocols. These can be for forthcoming or ongoing research. Information on trial registration (where applicable) and ethics approval should be included in the manuscript.
8. Editorials: Editorials are short articles on topics of recent interest that discuss the findings, implications, and/or outcomes of specific research or wider research on a general topic. These articles are usually commissioned by the Editor.
9. Opinion: Similar to Editorials, these short articles address a topic under debate, and provide the opportunity for the author to voice their opinion on a particular study or area of research. These articles are usually commissioned by the Editor.
10. Letters to the Editor. These brief pieces should be as concise as possible, usually no more than 1000 words.
The Sage Author Gateway has some general advice and on how to get published, plus links to further resources. Sage Author Services also offers authors a variety of ways to improve and enhance their article including English language editing, plagiarism detection, and video abstract and infographic preparation.
3.3.1 Making your article discoverable
When writing up your paper, think about how you can make it discoverable. The title, keywords and abstract are key to ensuring readers find your article through search engines such as Google. For information and guidance on how best to title your article, write your abstract and select your keywords, have a look at this page on the Gateway: How to Help Readers Find Your Article Online
Following a preliminary triage to eliminate submissions unsuitable for Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology all papers are sent out for review. The covering letter is important. To help the Editor in his preliminary evaluation, please indicate why you think the paper suitable for publication. If your paper should be considered for fast-track publication, please explain why.
The journal’s policy is to have manuscripts reviewed by two expert reviewers. Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology utilizes a single-anonymize peer review process in which the reviewer’s name and information is withheld from the author. Reviewers may at their own discretion opt to reveal their names to the author in their review but our standard policy practice is for their identities to remain concealed. All manuscripts are reviewed as rapidly as possible, while maintaining rigor. Reviewers make comments to the author and recommendations to the Editor-in-Chief who then makes the final decision.
The Editor or members of the Editorial Board may occasionally submit their own manuscripts for possible publication in the journal. In these cases, the peer review process will be managed by alternative members of the Board and the submitting Editor / Board member will have no involvement in the decision-making process.
Papers should only be submitted for consideration once consent is given by all contributing authors. Those submitting papers should carefully check that all those whose work contributed to the paper are acknowledged as contributing authors. The list of authors should include all those who can legitimately claim authorship. This is all those who:
(i) Made a substantial contribution to the concept or design of the work; or acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data,
(ii) Drafted the article or revised it critically for important intellectual content,
(iii) Approved the version to be published,
(iv) Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content.
Authors should meet the conditions of all of the points above. Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content.
When a large, multicentre group has conducted the work, the group should identify the individuals who accept direct responsibility for the manuscript. These individuals should fully meet the criteria for authorship.
Acquisition of funding, collection of data, or general supervision of the research group alone does not constitute authorship, although all contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in the Acknowledgments section. Please refer to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) authorship guidelines for more information on authorship.
Please note that AI chatbots, for example ChatGPT, should not be listed as authors. For more information see the policy on Use of ChatGPT and generative AI tools.
All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an Acknowledgements section. Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help, or a department chair who provided only general support.
4.3.1 Third party submissions
Where an individual who is not listed as an author submits a manuscript on behalf of the author(s), a statement must be included in the Acknowledgements section of the manuscript and in the accompanying cover letter. The statements must:
• Disclose this type of editorial assistance – including the individual’s name, company and level of input
• Identify any entities that paid for this assistance
• Confirm that the listed authors have authorized the submission of their manuscript via third party and approved any statements or declarations, e.g. conflicting interests, funding, etc.
Where appropriate, Sage reserves the right to deny consideration to manuscripts submitted by a third party rather than by the authors themselves.
4.3.2 Writing assistance
Individuals who provided writing assistance, e.g. from a specialist communications company, do not qualify as authors and so should be included in the Acknowledgements section. Authors must disclose any writing assistance – including the individual’s name, company and level of input – and identify the entity that paid for this assistance. It is not necessary to disclose use of language polishing services.
Any acknowledgements should appear first at the end of your article prior to your Declaration of Conflicting Interests (if applicable), any notes and your References.
Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology requires all authors to acknowledge their funding in a consistent fashion under a separate heading. Please visit the Funding Acknowledgements page on the Sage Journal Author Gateway to confirm the format of the acknowledgment text in the event of funding, or state that: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
It is the policy of Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology to require a declaration of conflicting interests from all authors enabling a statement to be carried within the paginated pages of all published articles.
Please ensure that a ‘Declaration of Conflicting Interests’ statement is included at the end of your manuscript, after any acknowledgements and prior to the references. If no conflict exists, please state that ‘The Author(s) declare(s) that there is no conflict of interest’.
For guidance on conflict of interest statements, please see the ICMJE recommendations.
Medical research involving human subjects must be conducted according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
Submitted manuscripts should conform to the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, and all papers reporting animal and/or human studies must state in the methods section that the relevant Ethics Committee or Institutional Review Board provided (or waived) approval. Please ensure that you have provided the full name and institution of the review committee, in addition to the approval number.
For research articles, authors are also required to state in the methods section whether participants provided informed consent and whether the consent was written or verbal.
Information on informed consent to report individual cases or case series should be included in the manuscript text. A statement is required regarding whether written informed consent for patient information and images to be published was provided by the patient(s) or a legally authorized representative. Please do not submit the patient’s actual written informed consent with your article, as this in itself breaches the patient’s confidentiality. The Journal requests that you confirm to us, in writing, that you have obtained written informed consent but the written consent itself should be held by the authors/investigators themselves, for example in a patient’s hospital record. The confirmatory letter may be uploaded with your submission as a separate file.
Please also refer to the ICMJE Recommendations for the Protection of Research Participants
All research involving animals submitted for publication must be approved by an ethics committee with oversight of the facility in which the studies were conducted. The Journal has adopted the ARRIVE guidelines.
Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology conforms to the ICMJE requirement that clinical trials are registered in a WHO-approved public trials registry at or before the time of first patient enrolment as a condition of consideration for publication. The trial registry name and URL, and registration number must be included at the end of the abstract.
The relevant EQUATOR Network reporting guidelines should be followed depending on the type of study. For example, all randomized controlled trials submitted for publication should include a completed CONSORT flow chart as a cited figure and the completed CONSORT checklist should be uploaded with your submission as a supplementary file. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses should include the completed PRISMA flow chart as a cited figure and the completed PRISMA checklist should be uploaded with your submission as a supplementary file. The EQUATOR wizard can help you identify the appropriate guideline.
Other resources can be found at NLM’s Research Reporting Guidelines and Initiatives.
Sage acknowledges the importance of research data availability as an integral part of the research and verification process for academic journal articles.
Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology requests all authors submitting any primary data used in their research articles, if the articles are accepted, to be published in the online version of the journal, or provide detailed information in their articles on how the data can be obtained. This information should include links to third-party data repositories or detailed contact information for third-party data sources. Data available only on an author-maintained website will need to be loaded onto either the journal’s platform or a third-party platform to ensure continuing accessibility. Examples of data types include but are not limited to statistical data files, replication code, text files, audio files, images, videos, appendices, and additional charts and graphs necessary to understand the original research. The editor(s) may consider limited embargoes on proprietary data. The editor(s) can also grant exceptions for data that cannot legally or ethically be released. All data submitted should comply with Institutional or Ethical Review Board requirements and applicable government regulations. For further information, please contact the editorial office at [Neisha.Jobanputra@sagepub.co.uk].
Sage is committed to upholding the integrity of the academic record. We encourage authors to refer to the Committee on Publication Ethics’ International Standards for Authors and view the Publication Ethics page on the Sage Author Gateway.
Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology and Sage take issues of copyright infringement, plagiarism or other breaches of best practice in publication very seriously. We seek to protect the rights of our authors and we always investigate claims of plagiarism or misuse of published articles. Equally, we seek to protect the reputation of the journal against malpractice. Submitted articles may be checked with duplication-checking software. Where an article, for example, is found to have plagiarized other work or included third-party copyright material without permission or with insufficient acknowledgement, or where the authorship of the article is contested, we reserve the right to take action including, but not limited to: publishing an erratum or corrigendum (correction); retracting the article; taking up the matter with the head of department or dean of the author's institution and/or relevant academic bodies or societies; or taking appropriate legal action.
5.1.2 Prior publication
If material has been previously published, it is not generally acceptable for publication in a Sage journal. However, there are certain circumstances where previously published material can be considered for publication. Please refer to the guidance on the Sage Author Gateway or if in doubt, contact the Editor at the address given below.
Before publication Sage requires the author as the rights holder to sign a Journal Contributor’s Publishing Agreement. Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology publishes manuscripts under Creative Commons licenses. The standard license for the journal is Creative Commons by Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC), which allows others to re-use the work without permission as long as the work is properly referenced and the use is non-commercial. For more information, you are advised to visit Sage's OA licenses page
Alternative license arrangements are available, for example, to meet particular funder mandates, made at the author’s request.
The preferred format for your manuscript is Word. LaTeX files are also accepted. Word and (La)Tex templates are available on the Manuscript Submission Guidelines page of our Author Gateway.
For guidance on the preparation of illustrations, pictures and graphs in electronic format, please visit Sage’s Manuscript Submission Guidelines
Figures supplied in color will appear in color online.
This journal is able to host additional materials online (e.g. datasets, podcasts, videos, images etc) alongside the full-text of the article. These will be subjected to peer-review alongside the article. For more information please refer to our guidelines on submitting supplementary files, which can be found within our Manuscript Submission Guidelines page.
Authors seeking assistance with English language editing, translation, or figure and manuscript formatting to fit the journal’s specifications should consider using Sage Language Services. Visit Sage Language Services on our Journal Author Gateway for further information.
Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology is hosted on Sage Track, a web based online submission and peer review system powered by ScholarOne™ Manuscripts. Visit https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/cmic to login and submit your article online.
IMPORTANT: Please check whether you already have an account in the system before trying to create a new one. If you have reviewed or authored for the journal in the past year it is likely that you will have had an account created. For further guidance on submitting your manuscript online please visit ScholarOne Online Help.
Please supply a title, short title, an abstract and keywords to accompany your article. The title, keywords and abstract are key to ensuring readers find your article online through online search engines such as Google. Please refer to the information and guidance on how best to title your article, write your abstract and select your keywords by visiting the Sage Journal Author Gateway for guidelines on How to Help Readers Find Your Article Online.
Provide full contact details for the corresponding author including email, mailing address and telephone numbers. Academic affiliations are required for all co-authors. These details should be presented separately to the main text of the article to facilitate anonymous peer review.
You will be asked to provide contact details and academic affiliations for all co-authors via the submission system and identify who is to be the corresponding author. These details must match what appears on your manuscript. At this stage please ensure you have included all the required statements and declarations and uploaded any additional supplementary files (including reporting guidelines where relevant).
As part of our commitment to ensuring an ethical, transparent and fair peer review process Sage is a supporting member of ORCID, the Open Researcher and Contributor ID. ORCID provides a unique and persistent digital identifier that distinguishes researchers from every other researcher, even those who share the same name, and, through integration in key research workflows such as manuscript and grant submission, supports automated linkages between researchers and their professional activities, ensuring that their work is recognized.
The collection of ORCID IDs from corresponding authors is now part of the submission process of this journal. If you already have an ORCID iD you will be asked to associate that to your submission during the online submission process. We also strongly encourage all co-authors to link their ORCID ID to their accounts in our online peer review platforms. It takes seconds to do: click the link when prompted, sign into your ORCID account and our systems are automatically updated. Your ORCID iD will become part of your accepted publication’s metadata, making your work attributable to you and only you. Your ORCID iD is published with your article so that fellow researchers reading your work can link to your ORCID profile and from there link to your other publications.
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere. For further information including guidance on fair dealing for criticism and review, please visit our Frequently Asked Questions on the Sage Journal Author Gateway.
If your paper is accepted for publication after peer review, you will first be asked to complete the contributor’s publishing agreement. Once your manuscript files have been checked for Sage Production, the corresponding author will be asked to pay the article processing charge (APC) via a payment link. Once the APC has been processed, your article will be prepared for publication and can appear online within an average of 30 days. Please note that no production work will occur on your paper until the APC has been received.
Your Sage Production Editor will keep you informed as to your article’s progress throughout the production process. Proofs will made available to the corresponding author via our editing portal Sage Edit, or by email to the corresponding author and should be returned promptly. Authors are reminded to check their proofs carefully to confirm that all author information, including names, affiliations, sequence and contact details are correct, and that Funding and Conflict of Interest statements, if any, are accurate.
One of the many benefits of publishing your research in an open access journal is the speed to publication. With no page count constraints, your article will be published online in a fully citable form with a DOI number as soon as it has completed the production process. At this time it will be completely free to view and download for all.
Publication is not the end of the process! You can help disseminate your paper and ensure it is as widely read and cited as possible. The Sage Author Gateway has numerous resources to help you promote your work. Visit the Promote Your Article page on the Gateway for tips and advice.
Any correspondence, queries or additional requests for information on the Manuscript Submission process should be sent to the Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology editorial office as follows: